| UnderstatedCornHole said: That logic is sheer fallacy type thinking and here is why, There is zero evidence and zero specific accusations against Russia. Zero, nothing, nada. Just a vague few statements from the democratic staffed offices on democratic payroll who have a conflict of interest. Without evidence, even a smigen, anything at all to expect, I repeat ANYTHING, no logical person who isn't showing confirmation bias can accept this accusation. The fact there is absolutely no specifc accusation whatsoever says it all. Now on the Hillary statement you have fallen into the trap of thinking that all countries that endorsed her, did it formally? Really? What evidence do you have to show that no countries endorsed her behind closed doors? (I'm just using that fallacy to show you what I mean) Did Morocco endorse her officially with their contribution of 10 million? Did Saudi Arabia officially declare their contributions? No. I deal in knowns and work from there. |
What evidence do you have that says otherwise? Facebook? Youtube? You're just a person like me on the internet. You don't trust what the CIA says, ok fine I don't care, but they're the professionals when it comes to these case.
And isn't it common knowledge that friendly countries would support the candidate that they deemed more worthy? So what evidence do you have that says countries endorsed Hillary behind closed doors in such a way that would question and doubt our democracy?
