By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
burninmylight said:
DonFerrari said:

I don't remember taking you as an student of anything. Have I attacked you? Nope, but you know you done and recognized it.

People of which position are you saying I am?

Perhaps we bring more consoles to give context instead of wishfull thinking? And considering you got warned by a mod it doesn't seem like I was the only one seeing you dishing personal attacks.

Who have I attacked? Again, if you feel threatened, then report me.

Bringing other consoles to "give context" in this thread doesn't prove anything. The question wasn't about sales of prior FF games on Nintendo consoles. The question was whether the Switch can even handle a port of FFXVI. Past consoles have absolulely zero bearing on that. You seem to have been keeping up with the thread and everything I post, so why is that so hard to comprehend?

And I got warned for going off topic for too long, not for personal attacks. What are you attempting to do now? Go off topic... but don't worry, I won't report you. You da real MVP.

Doing a port of FF XVI... on Switch 0,6TF when they will at the same time dev for Scorpio on 6+TF seems really simple. Even better is how much 3rd party sells on Nintendo consoles, and the premise of OP that FF is selling less but associating that with PS and that putting the games on Nintendo would make sales sky high



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."