By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
JRPGfan on 06 December 2016
Edit Thread
UnderstatedCornHole said:
JRPGfan said:

You do realise the weapons today are capable of like laying waste to the intire surface of the world, 12 times over or something like that right?

Any war that ends up being faught like this... there is no winner, only losers.

Its why its called MAD - mutual assured destruction.

A real war between the US and China, doesnt end well.

 

A trade war? US probably suffers just as much as china does in that situation.  Doubt anything good will come of that either.

I don't disagree with you.

If war is iminent with any super power then a first strike is always the only possible option at staying alive.

I'm not surw what is wrong with stating that as a universal fact. "Iminent" by definition means unavoidable.

Thats just crazy.

You know they built those silo's to be able to withstand a attack right?

So the missils fly reguardless of who strikes first or not, both parties get hit.

Just being first doesnt win you a war like that. Both sides lose, its the only outcome.



Also you dont know whats unavoidable or not, and the only thing you can know for certain,

is if you strike first, you ll get a strike back.