By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
m_csquare said:
Ka-pi96 said:

Firstly, what the majority wants is irrelevant. When people say `x sucks, why can`t they do y instead` I think it`s safe to say that they are saying they don`t like x and want y instead and aren`t pretending to speak on behalf of the majority or anything like that.

Secondly, it doesn`t matter whether it`s an unpopular opinion or not doesn`t change the fact that people are complaining about what they see as a worse direction.

Finally, it`s only got a 1 higher metascore over 13 and in the UK (IIRC the only reason we know for sure so far) it actually sold less at launch than 13, so even assuming the majority prefers it over 13 (let alone older, better FF games) is strenuous at best.

Well arent you a special snowflake?

I, for one, rated ffxv 10points lower than metacritic, but that doesnt mean my opinion is more important than theirs. Ppl weigh different things differently. I think story and character are much more important in rpg, but others maybe dont.

But then again double standard exist. The so-called king of jrpg (you knw what it is) could get away with terribad story and super outdated graphic, while others would always get bashed if they have the same issues.

And please.. the current standard is different than standard from 10 years ago. We dont see 9s and 10s thrown at every game nowadays.

Funny thing is that you go on to say that opinion is subjective, that every person will feel different about the game and all,but then you go on and bash FF for getting away of criticism and suggesting that the past games are overrated and nowadays games are rated more "fairly".You go on to say about double standard, but here you you practicing it yourself.Please.

Well arent you a special snowflake?



My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.

https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1