Augen said:
I'd vouch for Ratchet and Clank. While it may be a remake, as someone who is a big fan of the series it is from the ground up redone and plays better as well. To me, it is the gold standard of remakes and well worth it even if you've played the original multiple times. To call it "just a remake" that "you can get on PS2" is really under selling what Sony and Insomniac did. |
If a game is rereleased 20 times and all those times it sell a lot it certainly means it's very important for those consumers, so to me that only means "I want to have smaller number of multimillion seller games" and use that for some reason that can or not be good.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."
