Aura7541 said:
And here's the kicker. The gaming industry has proposed its compensation plans, but the SAG-AFTRA leaders prohibited its members from voting. Rather odd that the leaders refuse to engage in a democratic process... |
Don't know the details of course. But it seems you don't know how these things work. The members of a union normally agree and vote on bottom lines before negotiations start. The union negotiators are given a mandate to negotiate, and that mandatre includes deciding whether the bottom lines have been met. If they decide the offer doesn't meet the bottom lines then they don't put the offer up for a vote. It saves union members from having to vote on each and every little movement the other side makes and prevents the employer / industry negotiators from making meaningless cosmetic changes to deals and effectively spamming the union by having them waste time by voting on every offer put forward.
But, you know, keep being an apologist for the actual fat cat arseholes who try to underpay everyone in the games industry.
“The fundamental cause of the trouble is that in the modern world the stupid are cocksure while the intelligent are full of doubt.” - Bertrand Russell
"When the power of love overcomes the love of power, the world will know peace."
Jimi Hendrix







