Soundwave said:
The investment is not really the issue. That's fine. The fact that this is the best deal they could get is the issue because it shows Trump is going to be pretty impotent against outsourcing. This is a cherry picked company (Carrier) that was perfect to lay down the law with. Their parent company has 5 billion+ in government contracts (meaning 5 billion in US tax payer money). This was a relatively small number of jobs 2000. They were put under a public microscope by being dragged into the US election stuff. You have the president elect directly getting involved. And the *best* they could do is save <50% of these jobs. That's pathetic, I'm sorry, but it shows the government really can't do shit to these companies. Most companies don't have billions of dollars in defence contracts with the US gov't, in a situation like this they would just tell the gov't to go pound sand. And rightfully so. Trump said he would impose 35% tarrifs on companies that did what Carrier is doing. He has backtracked on this already. |
In reality this deal was mike pence. He is still the governer of indiana that is why they had some power to make it happen. Trump was the driving force behind it maybe, but it was Pence's deal to make.
Also, that is not exactly what trump said. He wants to lower corporate taxes, reduce costly regulation, and recreate other incentives to spur on job creation. The tariff would only happen once all those things were in place and the company still wants to leave. We can know if he is keeping his promise on that until taxes are lowered, regulations are cut and companies still try to leave.
As things stand now Trump understands why they want to leave. He is a businessman, he knows what factors cause even him to produce some of his products overseas.
psn- tokila
add me, the more the merrier.







