miz1q2w3e said:
Linkzmax said:
Sorry for the wait. Thanks again for the unvote, miz. Though it doesn't seem like anyone would've hammered in the past few hours anyway. |
Yeah, but I didn't wanna take the chance.
Linkzmax said:
I disagree, as I did Day 1 when prof said something similar. I'd say Clyde fills that description more than Noctis.
You call his questioning of you on the three lynchees filler, but as prof points out there's good reason to ask such a question.
Clyde's recent contributions were to once again bring up flavor and role meta, and stating prof's analysis of him is good. In fact I wouldn't call a single Day 2 post of Clyde's scumhunting, until his latest post in which he questioned darwin.
|
That move from Clyde where he tried to draw mafia attention to himself, he feels slightly townier than Noctis. Even though both are kinda lurky.
Linkzmax said:
EBWOP:
Why do you think Noctis chose to quote you rather than someone else? |
Cuz I kept trying to BW (bandwagon) on him? That would be my guess.
|
What if Clyde was mafia trying to draw town to himself?
Oh yeah, I completely forgot you voted Noctis early Day 1 and then tried to get him lynched towards the end. I didn't even get the sense he was on your scumdar until you reacted to his question.
Has each push been initiated by his unwillingness to lynch a lurker Day 1? I understand how you're calling him an active lurker now, but I'm not sure if it's biased due to your earlier suspicion.
