By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
DonFerrari on 01 December 2016
Edit Thread
Volterra_90 said:
ktay95 said:

Bravely Default, Dragon Quest, I am Setsuna.

It's not like they aren't making them at all. 

But if you really think Pokemon is a good indicator for potential buyers of a turn based RPG in a different franchise on a completely different console aimed at different markets than you need to stop letting your bias get in the way.

My point is, better worded, that Pokemon was always a turn-based games franchise, and it was always sucessful for years. SE decided to ditch the turn-based aspect from FF games, for no reason imho. It was doing pretty well.

I also don't like that they did, but considering WRPG were selling a lot better than JRPG on last gen I can understand they doing it. Pokemon didn't sold because of turnbased



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."