rocketpig said:
*bleu-ocelot* said:
bbsin said:
This guy includes some spoilers in his review, BE WARNED!!!
Anyways, It seems like this review has never been a big fan of MGS in the past. From what I read, he's basically saying that MGS4 has gameplay that has advanced alot from the previous MGS games but hasn't been changed enough for his liking. He also keeps bringing up that he thinks players that have always disliked MGS before will continue to do so. And he concludes with MGS4 including some of the most classic moments in gaming and "exquisite" game elements, he's glad that this is the end of MGS. Oli Welsh's (the reviewer) entire review resume has been MarioKartWii (8/10), Army of Two (no score), a re-review of WOW and Pirates of the burning sea (no score). Based on his source history, he's pretty new at Eurogamer as his articles points to him joining the staff on February of this year. |
That last bit about him being glad the series is over,totally discredits him as a fair reviewer. |
Uh, no. It has nothing to do with him being a reviewer. From what I know of MGS4, it seems to be the logical end to the series, much like Halo 3. There's nothing wrong with wanting to see a series end gracefully instead of being whored out for years. |
Not really much of a "gracefull end" if the reviewer is constantly talking about how much of a irrelevent change MGS4 is from the other MGS games. He want's MGS to end because he doesn't want to accept it for what it is, he's essentially complaining that MGS is much like MGS.
