Nem said:
AsGryffynn said:
Of course it's fair! The whole point was people in urban regions will vote differently from people in the countryside, but the countryside seems unable to hold the same amount of people. How do you give the people in the rural and sparsely populated flyover US the same weight and firepower as those in the cities? You destroy the boundary between both to ensure the urban population has less power.
The reason Clinton had more votes was solely because of one state: California. Since Trump didn't even bother campaigning for the 55 electoral votes California packs, the state was lost in a mudslide and almost everyone decided to vote for the crook instead. In other words, the Hollywood celebrities pack the most electoral votes, but they pack far more people than this.
|
Err...? So you want to give countryside people more power so they rule over the ones in the coast? And this is fair and democratic how?
I think the whole problem is the perception of interior vs coast. It's the same country! This is not unique to the USA. It doesn't mean people on the coast aren't more or less important than the ones in the interior. Everyone is the same regardless of where you live. 1 person = 1 vote. Equality. That is what democracy is.
And quite honestly i'm sick of listening to the Hillary is crooked BS. No, Trump is crooked! And anyone with a shred of common sense could've seen that.
|
Hillary is the main character on the Good Wife.
A likely good natured women but is surrounded by so much corruption she is dirty by association.
