Slimebeast said:
A true communist is an economist, but how many of those are there these days? Perhaps 1% of the population. And all these progressive totalitarian leftists of today, they're definitely not liberals, although some of them have hijacked that name. Funny about your professor though since he's said to belong to the origin of this movement on the higher intellectual and academic level. Naturally you can't track cultural marxism to just one university though, and I've never belonged to those who claim it's a conspiracy. There's many factors, one of them being the 60's worldwide socialist youth movement when it was still largely economical, but became increasingly cultural. And the last 15-20 years are extremely important. |
Look, Marxist theory has never become cultural. You always had cultural interpretations, but these always deal with elite culture and inequality.
The kind of Cultural Marxism I hear so many people nagging on about DOES NOT EXIST. There has not been a cultural shift and especially not in these days, when the more hardline theories are reserting dominance. I can tell you, I'm in my university's local communist group, which has people from all kind of Marxist, Socialist and Communist thought and hardline Marxism-Lenninism has never been as popular. All the other left groups are likewise mainly focused on economic issues, with culture being a part of course, but only when it matters.
There has been no socialist conspiracy to apprehend and change culture. If anything, that's where liberals are good at (and that also explains why they are so suprised when people elect people like Trump, since they often live in social bubbles and can't see what happens at the lower and middle ends of society).