By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Mr Puggsly said:
DonFerrari said:

Well why them not picking Forza 6 versus GT 6 then and only comparing latest release? Or all Forza versus all GT, or all gen 7 forza versus GT? We know why. You want to get a cut were Forza sales were better.

It could, I don't fell the need to more frequent releases, once every 3 years is quite enough. This game alone takes like 6 months of my gaming time or more.

You may think that, we never had any speach of Sony about the releases of GT to evaluate their satisfaction. Funny enough that the small upgrade that is GT6 add more content than Forza 5 did right? And if Sony is so concerned with it they may as well increase the staff of PD. But I guess they are satisfied with the strategy and margin it gets. They don't push ND around neither push PD.

Sony should be more concerned about the lack of releases of Sony Japan Studios.

One GT every 3 years would be more frequent than what we see now.

Forza's annual strategy generated more revenue than GT6. I'm pointing out the advantage of more frequent releases. By the way, I only mentioned the annual strategy of Forza because you were boastng about GT6 sales and how it compares to other games in the genre.

ND puts out games faster than PD. They also create games that will generate more profits via remasters.

Yes it would be more frequent, it may happen or not. But from what I remember from GT4, GT5p, GT5 and GT6 there weren't much more than 3 years gap between then.

You are poiting the benefit of greater revenue, but since you have iota information about profit you can't really point it being more profitable or not.

I were boasting? Nope for the 3rd or 4th time, what I said is that even the worst selling GT game still is quite over the competitors and that is against people preaching the franchise is dying. You took it the way you wanted because you want to put the franchise down.

Yes ND does, and their team is 3x bigger than PD.

Nem said:
DonFerrari said:

Yes, my opinion isn't a fact. But the history backs up my opinion that they have been like this and not that they got like this. You don't need to thank.

But I'm yet to see the backing of your opinion that increasing the release pace would be better, the decrease in sales would show otherwise that they need bigger gaps and more content.

History backs up your opinion? The history says sales dropped more than 50%. So... try to understand that and how to fix it? Pretending there isn't a problem really is just ignoring it and hoping it goes away.

Both our opinions are opinions. Nothing but logic or conjecture to them. We use examples to draw paralels, but that is the point of a forum hm? I know you disagree, but the animosity you showed with the previous post was pretty unecessary. 

Anyone here said there isn't a problem? Just waiting to know how the solution for a supposed franchise fatigue is to push even more games of it.

What animosity?



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."