| Okie_Loki said: Should most likely drop into the low 80s when all the reveiws come in. And for the people who reviews and scores are important, anything less than a 90 for a game that took over 10 years to develop should be unacceptable. Can't have your cake and eat it too. |
This demonstrates a profound lack of understanding and general naïveté regarding how game development works and a lack of knowledge of this game's history in development.
And time spent does not increase or reduce quality, nor should it even factor in to the judgment of the creation as it stands. If it's good it's good, if it's bad it's bad. The rest is all pointless drama and white noise.







