KLXVER said:
Its because Hillary supports the recounts in three states. The same woman who told Trump to accept the results. |
Accepting the final results of the election and wanting a recount in three very close states do not cancel eachother out.
She cautioned him that should the results be a solid victory for her, he should not call on people to go out and revolt against the results, refusing to accept the legitimacy of the election and the votes cast.
Now, he has won, but only narrowly in three states which hands him the victory in the Electoral College, with her being 2 million ahead of him in the popular vote. If this recount (Which was suggested and funded by Jill Stein btw not Clinton intially) shows that she actually won those three states, she would actually be the one the people chose to be president, by both the electoral college and popular vote.
If the recount has him winning, it means he is legitimate, and she has already conceded the victory in this senario. Should the recount show her winning, then the true results were her winning all along. I fail to see the hypocrisy from Clinton in this regard.
