NJ5 said:
The fact that everyone keeps cherry picking Halo 3 as proof of Eurogamer's bias leads me to believe that that's all people have to try to prove their bias. To go straight to the point, no, I don't think Halo 3 deserves that score, but that's not the only hyped game which had inflated scores from all sorts of reviewers... GTA4 anyone? There are certain games which somehow (conspiracy or not) just seem to be awarded big scores independently of their flaws, but that's in no way enough to prove that Eurogamer is biased towards the 360. Mentioning Ninja Gaiden in this context is very justified, as that's a recent 360 exclusive of decent importance. If Eurogamer really was biased enough towards the 360 to bother with lowering MGS4's score, why wouldn't they give Ninja Gaiden 2 better than a 7/10? You sound no more credible than loads of other conspiracy theorists who tend to contradict each other, and quickly move on to the next conspiracy theory as gamers' change their focus to the next big game, and await the next wave of fresh reviews to bash.
|
i have not mentioned HALO once. to mention that game would be stupid being as every ohter site gave those Halo games good scores.
Like i said, look at the graphics comparisons and read the comments, need i say any more. GTAIV comp in particular
