Mr Puggsly said:
Wow, you're like a master at this debate thing. I obviously picked 2013 because they was the last time we saw a GT game. I would have probably picked 2015 or 2016 if Polyphony could get a game on the market in a reasonable amount of time. Based on the footage we've of GT Sport, it doesn't look ground breaking for the long development time. |
Thanks for the compliment.
No, it seems like you picked 2013 so you could put GT6 against Forza 5, 6 Horizon 2 and 3. When GT Sports launch are you going to do a GT versus Forza since 2017?
Nem said:
As i said, Forza overdid it, but GT is underdoing it. Say if there was a GT horizon or GT Arcade or GT drive club to hop with the main series, you'd have a new main entry every 4 years and a spin-off every 4 years. I don't think there would be any fatigue and the brand would regain it's exposure. I do think this is where both GT and Forza have failed. Both have gone too far in the spectrum when theres a nice sweet spot in the middle. |
Your opinion is they are underdoing, not that it's a fact.
Do you think you would like a Mario 3D alternating with a 2D year in and year out or every 2 years? Do you think Nintendo would sell even more?
The thing is GT never gone anywhere, they were always a franchise with big time lapse between them. And we don't need a GT horizon, (GT arcade is already part of GT anyway). We had motorstorm and other franchises exclusive to PS to cover for that. We don't need everything to be spin-off of GT.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."