By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Linkzmax said:
Clyde32 said:
I'd place a FoS on Darwin and a HoS on Mr. P still.

I'd like to think people learn from their past mistakes. The same applies to the way you play each game.

For me I like to play different each game with a heavy focus on one strategy and see if it works. In doing this I have hope that in the future I can integrate every strategy as the situation calls for it.

If Mr. P played one way as a mafia in a previous game, it's entirely possible that he could have learned a bit from his mistakes in the past and be trying out a new way of playing. This is assuming he's willing to try to learn from the past.

I think it's quite naive to think Mr.P, if mafia again, would play as defensively as he did last game with so many of the same players. Yet prof pointed that out as a defense for him, and it was enough for you to unvote. So what are your thoughts on prof, and why the FoS on darwin?

I usually reserve a FoS to someone I get a vibe from. HoS when I get something a bit more, and a vote for when there's definitely something to be found from that player. 

I think Prof is a very hard player to read. He's either a huge boon or a huge bane to the town. I will say that for how much he was throwing dirt on to Darwin, he didn't really cast a vote to seal the deal. 

Mr.Playstation said:
Stefl1504 said:

@ miz, a town bulletproof would make just as much sense tbh, but yeah, scum has prolly their own machinations to counter it. I still believe that Mr. P is scum - mainly to just how fucking aggressive/rejective he was to people that asked him why he just tosses out those claims (I think that was me, linkz and another one), also darwin to be scum (because of how he reacted to linkz QT poke, but that might just be due to him looking it up when he was asked bout it... still rubbed me the wrong way, he kinda seemed quite aware of it without much thought)

To me it was quite clear that Baalz was a power role, didn't assume anything beyond that point, maybe that is why scum targeted him. (his whole reaction to my role).

Leaning town on linkz, ff and prof, though that might just as well be inspired by wishful thinking that I don't want to be blinded - likelyness of being town is ordered for me here(linkz most likely), I don't have much of a clear picture of noctis due to inactivity, but I get rubbed off in the wrong way by him actually dropping in to tie the vote. Axum/miz to me are also quite much of a wildcard, spurge is the classic enigma to me (well, not really, I think he is scum, but I always get that read from him just from basic interaction with other players). I am not sure what to make of clyde, I remember someone claiming he is inactive, when to me he seemed to have his fair share of activity compared to other players, and I was leaning town on him, #needstobeinvestigatedagain.

With all this:

Vote: Noctis



Vote: Stefl

Its day two, you can't just go around voting with your gut anymore. He never really tied the vote, he just voted and then things happened (Clyde unvoted, Prof voted Spurge, Final Fan voted for me and so on...). 

Actually I don't think there ever stops being a good time to throw votes, so long as they are within reason. Sometimes the best way to get information is to apply pressure.