By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Norris2k on 25 November 2016
Edit Thread
naruball said:
Norris2k said:

You can say the same thing about Trump haters. If he indicts her, you'll have the same people screaming about Democracy, about the Constitution, about the "American traditions", and he would have half the country and all the mainstream media against him. If he does not try to jail her,  it will be "lyer !". And if Trump fans are OK with the lie, they are dishonnest fanboys, and if they are not OK, then "you see, Trump is a lyer !".

At the end of the day, he does not jail her, he appoints or not someone that will look into it, and he will find something or not. She got massive speech money, donations and campain funds from the worst lobbyists on Earth, and you can already see her donations dropping now that she has nothing to sell. Based on common sense, she's probably guilty, but justice is not about common sense but about fairness and proves. So, I'd like to see her judged outside of a favorably rigged system, but I would accept there is not enough proves .

So, honnest feeling, I would be dissapointed if he does not appoint someone at some point. But he's still not President in Office, it could be a trick to start soft, or he could change depending on his popularity or a new wikileak.

Not the same, dude. Not by a long shot.

First of all, not everyone who disagrees with him is a hater, so I assume you're talking about a specific group.

So the haterz had a problem with him abusing his power against Clinton if he were to be elected president.

They now stress to the people who voted him that he's not keeping his promise. That's not a point against him, but against his voters.

So, no. If he does, yes he is damned. If he doesn't, he isn't. It's the reason that people who voted for him that comes into question.

I don't see how saying he's lying is not a point against him. Anyway, here, the point is "you should not have voted for him", wether he does the thing, or he does not do it, and wether you accept or not that he does do it... or does not do it. And that is totally similar to what trump fanboys do.

Regarding abusing power, I'm fully on the side of Giuliani when he says "there is a tradition of not going after your opponent in America, but there is also a tradition of equal Justice under the law". Just for Bill Clinton meeting privately an attorney General there is no equal justice. Trump litteraly "putting her in jail" would be abusing his power, but giving it a shot outside the influences there were, it is not. I value Justice more than tradition. Abusing his power would be to go after Obama or any sane Democrat or Republican. Not going after Clinton is like saying "being the not elected candidate is equivalent to a total immunity" from my point of view.