By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
naruball on 25 November 2016
Edit Thread
Norris2k said:
naruball said:
The problem I have with his "fans" (or should I say fanboys?) is that when he said he'd made sure she was jailed for her crime, they were all like "finally someone with balls who wants to do what needs to be done". And now the change their narrative with the whole "so big of him to get past this".

Seriously it's the exact opposite of "damned if you do, damned if you don't". His fans will come up with excuses for anything and everything he says and does.

You can say the same thing about Trump haters. If he indicts her, you'll have the same people screaming about Democracy, about the Constitution, about the "American traditions", and he would have half the country and all the mainstream media against him. If he does not try to jail her,  it will be "lyer !". And if Trump fans are OK with the lie, they are dishonnest fanboys, and if they are not OK, then "you see, Trump is a lyer !".

At the end of the day, he does not jail her, he appoints or not someone that will look into it, and he will find something or not. She got massive speech money, donations and campain funds from the worst lobbyists on Earth, and you can already see her donations dropping now that she has nothing to sell. Based on common sense, she's probably guilty, but justice is not about common sense but about fairness and proves. So, I'd like to see her judged outside of a favorably rigged system, but I would accept there is not enough proves .

So, honnest feeling, I would be dissapointed if he does not appoint someone at some point. But he's still not President in Office, it could be a trick to start soft, or he could change depending on his popularity or a new wikileak.

Not the same, dude. Not by a long shot.

First of all, not everyone who disagrees with him is a hater, so I assume you're talking about a specific group.

So the haterz had a problem with him abusing his power against Clinton if he were to be elected president.

They now stress to the people who voted him that he's not keeping his promise. That's not a point against him, but against his voters.

So, no. If he does, yes he is damned. If he doesn't, he isn't. It's the reason that people who voted for him that comes into question.