| Nautilus said: That baterry life, if true, ranges from being decent to good for all the power it punches(in handheld mode).Now as for the other data, cant quite understand it, so if someone could put it in perspective, I would appreciate it! |
Not a lot to go on.
X2 is based on the parker tegra SOC. has a GPU with the same 256 cuda cores X1 uses but both the CPU and GPU is ran at a higher clock. Benefits of being in a 16nm fab process as opposed to a 28nm process.
No mention of memory bandwidth but X1 had around 25GB/s on a 64bit bus. The Pascal based X2 should have double that since it's supposed to use a 128bit bus so we are looking at around 50GB/s memory bandwidth. It's also most likely using LPDDR4 just like the X1 so the gains in memory bandwidth come from the league bus width.
X1 used a 4x4 CPU core config. Low power and high power CPUs. Parker (X2) is supposed to be using better all round CPU cores but in a 2x4 config. No idea it that will carry over to the Switch.
I am surprised they are going with only 4GB of ram though, being that the Parker specification has support for up to 16GB of ram.
