LudicrousSpeed said:
What you're trying to say is you disagree with the meta for DC and you think it's a great game, which is fine. Personally I think ReCore is a great game yet it has a shit meta. Who cares? We aren't talking about your opinion or my opinion. The guy you quoted was talking about people he knows personally. So no, it's obviously not a moot point to them. Same goes for your response regarding exclusive shooters. He's talking about exclusive shooters to the PS4. So while you're rambling on about what is or isn't valid, how are two games released on every console like Destiny and CoD valid in regards to exclusive shooters? The fact that you'd need to reach for those two franchises actually shows how valid his friends point actually is :) |
So go read his point again where he pretends (using his friends as excuse) that those games simply doesn't exist not that they have low Metas.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







