| Intrinsic said: The switch isnt nearly as big a deal as you think it is. And lastly, in case you don't know it, to follow nintendos "lead" would be to go against everything that has made Sony and MS successful. You really think Sony and MS will drop AAA gaming experiences that currently require well over 50GB of data with 4k and HDR to go for 720p 15GB experiences? Naaaaaa, they were past that back in 2013. |
Hmmmm I agree with you to a certain point.The Switch is kind of a counter to Sony and Microsoft simply because the Wii U failed really bad, and they knew that sustaining two pieces of hardware(coupled with handheld diminishing relevance).So the Switch is a logical conclusion.
But I disagree on basically the rest.Nintendo is not giving up on anything.Switch is what everyone especulated to be:a hybrid.Or in another word, both a home console and a handheld.It is simply silly to think 'its a handheld being treated as a home console'.When it has functions from both home console and handheld, then by consequence it is both.Just because Nintendo wants to atract the handheld market to it to strenghten its installed base, dosent make it a handheld system.
Now, to the actual point at hand, I dont think Sony or Microsoft are going to counter atack it, not in the first year at least, simply because they are already pursuing 'alternative' play methods, such as VR with Sony(and soon Microsoft) and Microsoft with its play anywhere initiative.So they have their branching options.Now, if the Switch is a runaway success, then I see them doing something, though play anywhere is kind of the idea of Switch but apllied to PC and home consoles.
My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.
https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1







