| BraLoD said: If they bring it back just to screw it, yes, would be better to let it untouched, even as it would be at least a burst of happiness when it was announced. But if I'm getting at least another great game coming, I would pick it. I would rather have two games to love but some to hate than just one to love, in the end having more good games is always better. |
There's a point where the overwhelming negative factors that they're adding with these new sequels get to me, I don't know. Again, I think you're looking at it from the perspective of not having anything but silence. And yeah, two games and something to hate is better than just one game and nothing, in theory, but when a developer that misses the point keeps screwing with not only the core elements, but also messing up with the canon (like (Dead Rising spoiler, dunno if you care about these) making a classic, important main character a villain out-of-nowhere during the final ten seconds of the game for a very, very terrible and really dumb plot twist), and you see that the focus is even harder than ever to destroy these classic elements despite the developer saying over and over "going back to the roots!", then...I don't know. All I can wish is that they stop, honestly. They won't, and that's infuriating.
