Why is UC4 considered a better game than Rise of the Tomb Raider?

[DonFerrari]

S.T.A.G.E. said:

DonFerrari said:

I love to be considered idiot, but ok.

Have you ever considered that to your level of skill the game is challenging as is? Having the easier option (and it doesn't need to be dumbed down, sometimes very few minor adjustments could keep the soul of the game but still be accessible and on comparable hard challenge to you that is for other players) while for some other guys it still is quite easy since they can speedrun the game and finish it with initial equip. Still those guy accept you there and don't demand that the game lose the equips and other things they don't use.

Several folks complain VG nowadays is too easy and mention autosave, excess of items, etc... Guess what, you can still challenge yourself by restarting a game if you are hit once, or killed once, don't pick up the items, etc. You don't need to push your elitism feeling towards others.

You're not an idiot and I never suggested such. An easy option for Dark Souls...makes it no longer dark souls . For me the game is challenging...actually very challenging. I hadnt had my rear whipped like that since first playing the Witcher 2. The point of this game is for you to die numerous times.  Its not about elitism. Its about accepting the diversity of certai n types of games. I was introduced to dark souls because my friend couldnt beat it and gave it to me out of frustration. Just saying. The primacy concept of the game is to play it and survive it the way its meant to be played. Thats all I am saying. Its not about elitism, but rather more for more headstrong gamers who like to push their limits.

I have no issues with devs putting easy modes in most games. The majority of the market is casual, but this game was not made for casuals.

 

I will consider as you didn't had the intention. But when you insist that someone doesn't understand you are basically calling them an idiot for not being able to understand you. The right way would be "perhaps I'm explaining it right so that you see how I see". And I say that because I do understand what you are saying and I just disagree. GT games have the platinum time goal, those are for the real hardcore (even more on the S-license) but for some getting even Silver is already an almost impossible challenge. And that is what I'm trying to show you. Yes the point of Dark Souls is to make you die a lot and suffer. But my point is that for you that point is the current difficult level (maybe a little higher or lower would be the ideal limit for you), but for someone less able (because there is difference in hability, even after playing 650 hours of GT5 I wasn't able to clear all the S times, miss something between 20-50% and I'm pretty sure I wouldn't ever get the platinum on Vettel challenge or doing the timelap for Nurburgring. For me that is almost an impossible barrier that probably even after doubling my playtime I wouldn't be able to surpass.