AsGryffynn said:
Why not? The vast majority of those who bought Fallout 4 had never bought or played Fallout 3 (and don't even bring up the original two games). Or did you really think most longtime Fallout and TES fans buy games in console? They already have a WRPG to play, and this doesn't count because?
Quote me where I said "it'd sell more on the Xbox One" because I don't recall saying that. And MGS is smaller than FF. Stop treating this game as "Japanese game 387" and start treating it as "Fallout 4.5" you guys...
My prediction is based on actual data fed by other games. The ratio for most games this gen hasn't been beyond 4 to 1 so far. The only exception I recall was a remaster of a PSP game and perhaps MGSV, who did poorly in comparison to what this game is projected to do (the game barely broke 5M sales). I am not predicting using predictions. I am predicting by taking genre averages (and doing away with the genre divide) from games that have been out for at least a year. Or are Skyrim SE, GTA5 and Fallout 4 yet to release? Whoever thought people should be allowed to speak freely must be regretting what he said now... |
Nothing invalidates that they already had WRPG on the console, just that there is no evidence whatsoever that FF XV will have a better comparison on FF XV than it had on FF XIII 1-3. those were abysmal on X360 even if they had the tv for it.

duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."







