By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
pokoko said:
BeefWellingtonIII said:

 

It's easy for you to google "Obama banned muslims" and you can decide what source there you want to go with. Just because HuffingtonPost (propaganda that was proven to have colluded with DNC) or CNN (propaganda that was proven to have colluded with DNC) doesn't report it, doesn't mean it isn't true. Look for the facts. Go ahead look. You will try to spin it I'm sure, but that will only prove your biased denial.

I already did.  I found sources that referenced a freeze on anyone entering from Syria.  If that's what you're refering to, then that's just ignorant.  Obviously, that's not the same as "banning muslims" so I'm going to assume you meant something else.  Even a child knows that's a logical fallacy.  So, again, do you have a link that proves what you are saying?

He banned iraqi refugeees and several others from coming into the country.  He banned Muslim based/majority countries from being allowed to enter the United States.   He banned Muslim people from coming into America.  Countries that were known to have Terroristic threats, which were Muslim nations, were banned from entering the United States.   This is exactly what Donald Trump has proposed and it is exactly what Obama has done.   It's funny to see how you want to add the context to it for Obama, but not Trump.  You are clearly biased and not thinking clearly.

Here's another one for you.  Obama banned an Iranian Judge from hearing Immigration Cases regarding immigrants from Iran.   He obviously thought there would be a bias there.   Sounds exactly like when Trump said it would be unfair for a judge with La Raza ties and that very Pro-Mexican to judge his case, knowing how he wants to build the wall.  There would be a bias on the Judge. 

I'm sorry that you only live in a world with one sided stories, but the reality is there are at least two sides.