By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Zkuq said:
DonFerrari said:

I'm happy that you don't need money to live, most people need it.

For me sony could live it free for others to publish whatever they want, but seeing how android can get caotic and psn being a private space I accept they decide what can or not be released. But what I'm saying is quite different, is that if you demand that any patch is free then most of them can decide not to make it, but guess what you are free to not pay for the ones they charge, so why would you complain about the possibility?

Of course I need money to live, my life just doesn't revolve around it.

I don't really see much difference between the two cases. Pretty much everything you said also applies to new releases, so why curate what gets released on a console since you can just decide not to pay?

I already said I wouldn't mind they not curating, but understand they doing it because it's their platform. Sure you can say that they could demand all patches being free and mandatory, but that certainly would go well with developers, don't you think? Dictatorship was what put Nintendo in the situation they were on N64.

Back on money, a lot of people that say their live "don't revolve around money" do a lot of things to earn more.



duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363

Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"

http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994

Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."