Why is UC4 considered a better game than Rise of the Tomb Raider?

[DonFerrari]

S.T.A.G.E. said:

Fei-Hung said:

Ithink you've answered your own question. people might prefer it because it makes them feel like Rambo and the game becomes a walk in the park. 

 

I remember in the very first uncharted, the section where you have stone ruins and enemies coming from the opposite side and from the top of a walk way, I tried using a traditional tactic. stay behind cover and shoot. it didn't work as they start flanking you and push you from cover to cover. they even use grenades to flush you out before mowing you down. the TRR on the hand had very simple A.I. I didn't dislike it, but at no point did I feel threatened or challenged. however, I feel the challenging A.I adds to character, personality of Nathan as well as the story. 

Exactly. There were parts in even Uncharted 1 on crushing where I had to run for my life until I could find an open shot. Naughty Dogs AI is unmatched in the third person genre.

All 4 games had me on a pinch trying to play on crushing.

Mbolibombo said:

SWORDF1SH said:

I don't know who you are and quite frankly I don't give a fuck. You saying that you're "all ears" means jack shit to me. 

I'll tell you what, I'll make a thread titled "Why would anybody buy a PS4?". In the OP I'll write "XB1 is better I can't understand why people buy the PS4". I'll stand back and watch the carnage but wait, I put  "I'm all ears" in the OP so that doesn't make me a troll!!!

Say what you want but I've seen a lot of hit and run troll threads over the years and this one stinks of it. Now you can winge about it or prove me wrong and respond and participate in your own thread!

Did not know you set the rule when to reply to my own thread. No reason for you to question my intentions since you have no idea what I was up to during the day but if you wanna know I was hanging out with my kids for the most part which I have barely been able to during the last week thanks to a new job I took and simply didnt have the time to more than scim through the thread. Clearly Idont agree with what you just said and since we by the look of it cant have a discussion with a proper tone which will only lead to infractions  will just wish you a great day and take care. 

malistix1985 said:
I played both, Liked both but I don have an honest comparison.
Liked Tomb Raider way more because I played it on PC and it was in much better settings. Proberbly on the PS4pro it will be a simulair experience as on my PC.

Anyway, I liked the story and emotion more in UC4 but I felt like the game was a bit too slow.
On Rise of the Tomb Raider I liked the pace and more open world/side quest feel more

In the end I really disliked some of the sections from UC4 (dislike it a harsh word for sutch a great game) but I never felt a single moment of "lets skip to the good part" on ROTT but like I said I played it on my pc from 2013 which is a significantly faster experience then my ps4 (no offense) in loading times and graphics/framerate

Of all the posts this is what resembles my thoughts the most. UC4 has it's highlights and graphics is one of them - absolute stunner! I dont consider that something that makes a game better though. I also like the characters - Nathan is one of my favorites of all time - but some of the chapters feels a bit boring to do, a bit repetetive at times (It's UC after all)  I just wanted to be done with them. I never felt that way with Tomb Raider, great pace and action. It was just more fun.. more memorable for me. For the record I did enjoy UC4 more than the first Tomb Raider so it's not a franchise thing for me.

Maybe it's just me with Naughty Dog. It took me some time to realize how great Last of Us was.. It was like a month after I beat it I was still thinking about it and came to realize that I in fact loved the game. 

He doesn't, but the mods do. And permalite have advised you twice on first participate on your thread and second to drop this line of conversation. I haven't seem you follow any of them.

SWORDF1SH said:
A lot of people are ignoring that Tomb Raider has no multiplayer!!! That alone should put Uncharted a few marks over Tomb Raider. At the end of the day you can't push across your opinions as fact, some will prefer U4 and some will prefer RotTR and you can only discuss you reasons why one is better than the other and even go into it deeper and break it down into categories like some people have done.

But it's a fact that U4 has MP while RotTR doesn't. It's not an opinion and it's a fact. You can argue that you don't care about MP but if you look at it objectively it's still missing in RotTR. So no matter how close the campaign modes are, U4 has a huge chunk of game that is completely missing in RotTR.

Ultimately gamers and reviewers have spoken and if you can't handle that, just get over it. I swear this is like the tenth U4 vs RotTR thread I've seen.

RotTR looks like to be a solid game although I probably won't play it. I had Tomb Raider reboot with PS Plus and only played 30 mins before I got bored. But from what I can see TR and RotTR are both good games and I wouldn't smash somebody's opinion if they prefer those games. But I don't think people can argue with the fact that U4 is more of a complete package.

What OP doesn't seem to understand is how he's rubbing people up the wrong way. People will prefer U4 and to be told "I cant see a single thing that makes it a better game than Rise of the Tomb Raider" is only just going to piss people off. It's just ignorance. It's not even a well set up thread, no reasons are given why one is better than the other.

Yes, the "not a single thing" is very strong isn't it? We could say ROTR have exploration/free map plus crafting over UC4, but I still wouldn't put it above UC4 because of it.