By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
jason1637 said:
danasider said:
Honestly wouldn't surprise me if it were true. But whoever is using temper as a metric for voting can't vote Trump. He has been on a show where he's cursed at people and skewered them as a judge. He's been in many news interviews where he's insulted opponents in the fashion one of the characters from "Mean Girls" would be embarrassed to do so. And he's had a pattern of this temper in his own social media and at rallies in which he's called for violence.

Not to mention, I'd be ticked off with Matt Lauer, too. He had bias as a moderator and failed to fact check (well, he ignored in all honesty) a long standing lie that's been debunked time and time again by video proof (Trump claimed to never support the war after 9/11).

You need to do more research and have reports where the sources are verifiable.

Yeah both of them don't have the stamina.

Even if her tantrum did happen (which is a surprise to me, because I haven't seen it any any mainstream media, Fox News, included and no verifiable sources were given in the clip), I am not saying Clinton doesn't have the stamina. I am only agreeing that she may (or may not) have a temper.

She's been in politics for 30 years. She's been a first lady so she's seen what happens at office. She's been a senator, and she's been Secretary of State. That pretty much has me convinced she's got the stamina for office.

On the other hand, I see no evidence that Trump wouldn't melt down or make terrible choices under pressure, because his temper leads him to react in the most absurd and rash ways (on camera and on record). That and he has no real experience in office, whatsoever.