| Ganoncrotch said: When it comes to the 1080p on PS4 and 900p on the X1 I have to admit I would be slightly more keen to buy the system which has the higher performance when the software costs the same... when it comes to the console landscape, obviously a PC would offer higher settings again for the same price, but when it came to the PS4/X1 the additional power which came with the system was a nice factor... but it was not the deciding factor for me at all, the X1 reveal and Don Matticks idiotic stance where people asked him "is it going to be like steam" and he didn't just say "yes, yes it will be just like that, and gamers will love it like they love steam" instead he wanted to distance himself from Steam and claim it was unique... and no one wanted unique.
Edit - Should point out, that a lot of the time I play my PS4 via the remote play on the Vita anyway, so I'm experiencing the system streaming to a 540p device, so yeah a 900p original resolution wouldn't have hurt my experience too much. |
Its talk like that i just dont understsnd. To the point i actually even look at it as misinformation.
What PCs are people buying? How is it possible for a PC to offer better performance at the same price of a console? Or is it that when people say stuff like that they don't take into consideration EVERYTHING that actually makes up a PC or they are just talking like everyone has a desktop already and only have to buy a GPU?
I really don't get it. So just to be sure, that statement suggests that you can walk into a store, spend $400 on a PC that you intend to use primarily for playing games so at least you get a controller or mouse and keyboard too. And you would walk out with something that can outperform a PS4pro?
