By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
Final-Fan said:

I seriously doubt the accuracy of that first video. Multiplying 10 years of estimated nuclear winter (for a 100-nuke situation) by 190 in a 1:1 scale with the number of nukes seems like some serious bullshit to me. I don't recall hearing about a 180-day nuclear winter after WWII. And at the end he confused kilometers with miles!

Going deeper, I see evidence suggesting that the place he probably got his ten year estimate counted on 100 cities burning, not just one. Only one giant crater would not result in the same amount of soot in the air.
http://www.uow.edu.au/~bmartin/pubs/88spp.html

I haven't finished reading that source, btw.  There is probably a lot of pertinent info I haven't gotten to.  But I am satisfied that "bullshit = confirmed" on the video. 

Me too, I think it is a consensus the Earth would turn back into normal in 40-200 years. I suppose that If people focused in techniques to grow food without the sun, generate energy and conserve water, with enough money survival of a few would be possible, like in the Fallout video game franchise "Vaults".

I wonder if George Soros and the other crazies have bunkers somewhere...



My grammar errors are justified by the fact that I am a brazilian living in Brazil. I am also very stupid.