| Captain_Yuri said: Yes but I never said that I didn't know much about VA's side of things. I have said many times already that VA's can have more things (which includes better conditions and etc) as long as devs get something better. My entire issue is them wanting residual... Not having better working conditions and etc is not my issue because residual is something the devs do not have afaik. That's why I said they can have stuff but not something better than the devs (residuals as an example) and etc but if they do get something like residual, the devs should get it too... And yes, that makes it so that we aren't on the same page as far as importance of VAs go but that is the point of having different views... Not everyone sees things the same way but that is not the samething as having the lack of knowledge about a certain topic. |
But your pov is telling me that you don't. otherwise we wouldn't be having this talk in the frist place. You'd have seen the logic in why this strike is a thing and why VA's want said changes. But instead we've somehow pitted devs with VA's and the whole payment tree.
"as long as devs get something better", then just pay VA's worse off then devs and we get back to the whole scenario all over again. Why make a scheme to pay more than the other when we already have said scheme in place, the pubs get the biggest share, just like the Gov gets a huge share of your taxes, or a film production studio like WB. All we're doing here is injecting devs into the story and saying rthey deserve way more than VA's, it's not doing anything other than pointing out that VA's won't go anywhere if they are to be held low.
Letting them and devs have the residual can be a thing, rather than your view where the devs get the residual and the VA's not much else.
"And yes, that makes it so that we aren't on the same page as far as importance of VAs go but that is the point of having different views... Not everyone sees things the same way but that is not the samething as having the lack of knowledge about a certain topic."
Yeah, it points out that you are pro for the devs and less for the VA's, but you have to make nice for VA's to not sound as if you aren't for them. I'm actually for both, though I don't want one making massive heaps over the other (like the devs), I want a decnelt divide, not what we already have with all sorts of industries and hierarchies. You show a lack of knowledge due to how VA's oeprate and how they differ from devs, your own Pov points out how they matter less than devs. We can go back on "what did I say?", but it's not going to change the stance, this is why you said you should stop replying and yet we're here right now.
I'm not trying to hate on you or anyything. I just think it's utter trite to see people giving less of a shit for VA's and thinking they aren't as important in any of the industries they exist in. Those that aren't on the side of VA's show who they are and they qwon't care for it as much, hence why I believe they should stay out of the discussion ebcause they won't ever offer anything of value outside of arguments against what VA's are fighting for. If you are entirely more for devs then this isn't the thread for that.
Mankind, in its arrogance and self-delusion, must believe they are the mirrors to God in both their image and their power. If something shatters that mirror, then it must be totally destroyed.







