Video Game Voice Actor Strike Continues, as Union Pickets Batman Publisher This Week

[Jizz_Beard_thePirate]

Chazore said:

Captain_Yuri said:

Nope, I do not know about the VAs and that's the issue. I don't know how many people do either... You have followed them but most people aren't you and don't follow the VAs in games very strongly. Cause if that was the case, when franchises changed VAs, the sales would see a considerable dip if it mattered all that much. But most do not.

I said they aren't as essential as game developers. Yes they do have VA's but the issue is, how many people buy them for the VAs over gameplay? Cause I doubt most do... VA helps sure but more so than the gameplay?

And yea, those games do have VAs but again, I don't see why having mediocre VAs is as bad as having mediocre gameplay. If a game is filled with bugs, has bad gameplay, and etc, then that game will get a lower mark and will be far more disliked than a game with bad VA but checks the gameplay and other elements. 

I mean, I don't get what we are supposed to do if you don't agree to disagree... We have different viewpoints and neither of us are going to convience to other so... ¯_(ツ)_/¯

I guess I will just stop replying?

@Bold 1:

There are still a lot of people that follow these VA's though. You're now basing "most aren't you", when really I'm talking generally of other people that just happen to follow VA's. I don't follow every single VA known to man, some out there do and some like me follow a few or more. I take it you haven't seen anime conventions or generally comic conventions where VA's tend to show up?. DC Douglas known for Playing Wesker has a fanbase that follows him just for voicing Wesker and then there are those that follow him for the TV shows and movies he's been in, the guy shows up to conventions for fans alike.

@Bolded2:

See now we're getting to the point where you're saying VA's don't matter since sales don't dip because of them. You said before that you didn't say they weren't important, but say they aren't essential and now in terms of sales, why not just say they aren't important flat out?, because you've now got 2 over 1 in terms of against than for now.

You can stop replying if you want, but you're not really moving from your general stance and thus you aren't going to learn from what was said (because we've had a repeat of the they do/they don't matter for the final time so far with no difference in outcome).

I think I will take my chances tyvm.