| Solid-Stark said: Not to mention the FLOPS don't compare. i.e. 1.3 TF XOne vs 1.3TF ARM wouldn't be "equal". XOne would still be more capable. |
Do you mean Jaguar vs ARM Cortex-A57(rumor) or GCN 2.0 vs Pascal(still a rumor?)?
It doesn't really matter, Jaguars proccessors weren't known for being particulary decent at floating-point performance or anything else really.
Notes for fairness:
- This article was written in 2013. (Jaguar is an old ass cpu architechture.)
- Quacomm Snapdragon is a custom design based of ARM Cortex-A15.
- All ARM cores featured here are 32-bit proccessors. 64-bit ARM was introduced in 2014.
- I cherry picked this chart because is the only one I seen that shows floating-point performance.
- Jaguar performed slightly better on certain tasks, like physics. (Against these old ass 32-bit ARM cores.)
- Source.
That said, if you have any evidence that can back up your claim, kindly show it to me. I like learning new things.
“Simple minds have always confused great honesty with great rudeness.” - Sherlock Holmes, Elementary (2013).
"Did you guys expected some actual rational fact-based reasoning? ...you should already know I'm all about BS and fraudulence." - FunFan, VGchartz (2016)
