WagnerPaiva on 31 October 2016
| nanarchy said: So many options yet you failed to include a sane one. No nuclear war : Hillary still sucks though. Personally I think Clinton is best hope you have to prevent Nuclear war, she is just more of the same, as distasteful as she may be she is the safer choice. Trump would potentially unsettle the status quo and while that sounds cool the end result is likely to be huge turmoil and only takes one megalomaniac to press the button in rage (if not Trump for being insulted by someones tweet then one of the many others in the world). |
That is the thing: killing Bashar means world war 3, China and Russia promissed that.
And she said she will not rest till Bashar is dead. Trump said he does not want to kill Bashar, all he wants is to destroy ISIS.
Everyone think he is dangerous while she literally promisses us nuclear war.
My grammar errors are justified by the fact that I am a brazilian living in Brazil. I am also very stupid.
