pokoko said:
Doom? Dishonored? Wolfenstein? They were all very well received. That's the funny part. Bethesda is now stronger than they've ever been in terms of content and publishing. They're far better now than when they published junk like Wet and Rogue Warrior. And he's trying to act like they've fallen back? That's beyond ignorant. As far as Fallout 4 goes, it's fine if he doesn't like it, even if I think his reasons are silly. Quality-wise, it has far less bugs than New Vegas or Skyrim and is a better made game in most regards. It's absolutely rock solid for me right now and I have 100 mods running. It's pretty clear to me what he's trying to do and what a lot of others in the "gaming media" are going to do. I'm betting that Dishonored 2 is going to see harsher reviews than games that send out code early. |
He talked about devoloping not publishing. And youre saying that F4 is less buggy than F3 like it is an actuall improvement, games werent buggy at launch just some years ago before F3 came out. F1 and 2 werent buggy and so are still many games today who are getting released on consoles. Whats up with these excuses? No game should have game breaking bugs its unforgivable.
