By using this site, you agree to our Privacy Policy and our Terms of Use. Close
sc94597 on 29 May 2008
Edit Thread
noname2200 said:
sc94597 said:
noname2200 said:
sc94597 said:
noname2200 said:
sc94597 said:




Yeah , but if you read any of the quotes in the op you will know why the wii isn't weaker than the original xbox in some ways. Please read the op again if you haven't. If you don't understand then ask me to explain. It definately isn't a powerhouse, but 3 times more powerful isn't too much compared to what the ps360 are to the xbox. I shouldn't even say it in these linear terms. It shoudl be more on how much each area is better than each area of the xbox original. I will do that in my analysis.

 


 *shrug* Fair enough. I'm still not convinced, but I also still don't think it means diddly. The graphics we have are more than good enough for me: I play my Wii for its gameplay, not its graphics. Were my priorities the other way around, I'd be playing PC games exclusively.

@ Grampy: Yeah, the specs are known, as you posted...but I don't understand them. Sorry, but I learn just enough about computers to repair my own, and then I move on. So the stuff you posted may as well be in Klingon as far as I'm concerned: I just go by what people in the know tell me on a comparative basis, and by what my eyes have shown me. Sorry for mucking up your thread, though. 

@squillam: You're missing quite a few titles actually. And I do firmly believe that third parties have already started jumping into the Wii pool, and that we'll hear about the first real wave this E3. Mind you, I could be wrong (seems to be my thing today), but I'm flexible enough to stick my foot in my mouth without needing more than two operations afterwards, so I'll go ahead and say the cliched "wait 'til E3!"

Granted, Ubisoft is a prime example of a rather disoriented developer, so they definitely do exist... 

Fair Enough. When I make my analysis I'm going to explain what everything means, so maybe you could read that. It will be long though.