Soundwave said:
They've left the console market to Sony/MS. And I would say the same thing if Sony had made "Sony Switch" and no Playstation 4. So would a lot of people. Marketing gobbledeegoop is just that ... they can call it whatever they want, it is effectively getting out of the existing home console market. Which is fine. Like I said above if you were a lot better at tennis, had more fun playing tennis, got more satisfaction from playing tennis, then why the fuck are you even playing football. It's basically like the kid who keeps playing a sport he's not good at because his dad used to play it and he wants to keep up the family tradition even though he doesn't really like the sport. That's basically modern Nintendo's relationship with portables and consoles. They're way better at one, feel more comfortable with one, they don't even seem to like anything about consoles. Online play? Not really Nintendo's passion. Modern console hardware? Not really Nintendo's passion, consoles run too hot, even though why that is such a fucking concern is nominal since a console will always be plugged into wall power. Supporting a modern TV resolution (you know because HOME consoles are played on a TV)? Nope, not really something Nintendo cares for. Consoles need to be small. Why? Who the hell knows, for the person who lives in a house the size of a closet apparently. |
But the point is, you are wrong.First because Switch is after all a gaming console.By default it will be competing with Sony and Microsoft.I mean, it might not be competing head to head, but it will be regardless.
But I think the biggest mistake is that you are making alot of assumptions here and taking conclusions in which have big chance to be wrong.You are assuming they will have bad online play, when they showed nothing of the sort, and actually has alot going for it, being that the partneship with Dena(and it showing as one of the companies on board with the Switch), the New Nintendo reward program being at the moment heavily based around online interactivity, and many more.
You are assuming that it dosent have modern console hardware, yet it will be receiving(and being able to run) Skyrim Enhanced Edition, and (I suppose) a NBA game, plus all the other third party games already announced.Not only that, but that list of confirmed companies working on at least something for the Switch is, at least for Nintendo, impressive.Dont get me wrong:that may not turn to be true, or the games they bring in are shovelware, but at this point is a good sign.So, assuming that the Switch is at least capable of running current gen games from third party even if it isnt the most powerful out there, it will be a modern console wether you like it or not.
And when you say about the modern TV resolution, I assume you refer to the rumor about 720p max resolution rumor?Its a rumor man, and Im fairly certain that many credible people out there is saying that that rumor is false.But look no further for proof than the trailer itself.The Switch is running Zelda and supposedly Skyrim, which looks to be demanding games.So at the very least it will be more powerful than the Wii U.And the rant about the size, I wont even comment.
All in all, I think you are pissed about things you are imaginating, not about real facts or even things that have a chance to happen.My tip is:Take it easy, be more positive about the good news that came out of it, and wait for actual information pertaining those subjects to be actually pissed or happy about them.
My (locked) thread about how difficulty should be a decision for the developers, not the gamers.
https://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/thread.php?id=241866&page=1







