potato_hamster said:
pokoko said:
You might want to look at a mirror on that one, m'kay? Or did I imagine your "memo" remark? I ask because you keep saying stuff that honestly makes me wonder. Why would you bring up "nudity and child killing mods" when they aren't allowed on Bethesda.net at all, much less consoles? Sony and Bethesda might have made a deal but in the eyes of many consumers it is far from being a satisfactory resolution. Besides that, I don't even know why you started an argument when all I did was ask a rhetorical question that neither you nor I can answer yet. We can guess, sure, but unless you can prove to me that you knew Skyrim would be on a Nintendo system in the first place, then those are just assumptions. I'm not going to argue over assumptions and, frankly, I don't know why you want to.
|
You asked if there were mods, because if Nintendo had them, that mean that it would push Sony into the doghouse, and to me, being a reasonable person, the only way some could possibly think that were true was if they still thought mods weren't coming to the PS4. This is of course, assuming that the Switch actually gets a version of Skyrim that can support mods. For all you know it's getting a slightly more polished version of the PS3's version of Skyrim, and that's it.
But how? How can you possibly assume that if Nintendo has mods they will be less restrictive than Sony. Why would you think that? On what grounds? Nintendo doesn't even like people talking to each on their platforms (to the detriment of gameplay, might I add) because someone's poor precious darling might hear a bad word. Do you think for one second that Nintnendo is going to allow anything that /might/ alter a games ESRB rating for half a second?
Pardon me for assuming that you couldn't possibly have known that Sony and Bethesda had worked out an agreement, because it is not reasonable to assume that mod support on a Nintendo console would be more open than mod support on a Sony console. Sony won't allow users to use mods that require uploading external assets, what makes you think Nintendo will? Seriously. What other decisions and announcements have Nintendo made in the past, that would make you think they're more likely than Sony to allow mods with external assets.
Because based on my experience with them, to pretend that Nintendo is less likely to lockdown their console than Sony is is completely laughable.
|
How do you not understand that I was simply asking a question? At no point did I give my own opinion about Nintendo having mods or not. Seriously, why are you even trying to start an argument over this? No, I don't believe that Nintendo will have mods, I was simply asking others what they thought. Why would you argue with me about that? Makes zero sense.
As for Sony, they are absolutely in the doghouse right now with thousands of consumers. There is no arguing that with anyone who understands the situation.
I really, honestly, have no idea why you are trying to start an argument over a simple question.
