BattleField 1 is one of the worse performing tittles at 60fps on Consoles, runs at 620p in some cases! Awfull!

[Pemalite]

Radek said:

Pemalite said:

The Irony is... All those Jaguar "console" cores are roughly equivalent to a Core i3 3ghz Haswell anyway.

There isn't any "extreme optimization" happening. You are getting a compromised experience with less details, lower resolution.
If you want the PC experience, buy a PC.

Also. All the GPU's you listed in that benchmark are faster than the Xbox One, so why would you expect PC-levels of graphics/resolution and framerate out of the Xbox?

I posted these benchmarks to find out if PS4 Pro could possibly achieve stable 60 fps in 1080p on ultra details. No dynamic resolution bullcrap etc.

And I really wish people would stop freaking about on an idea of 500$-600$ premium consoles with powerful specs. Hell I'd say make just one powerful SKU for 500$ on launch, but consumers would boycott it..

Of course it can. But only if the developer gives it to you, you get what you are given with a console.
DICE might take advantage of Checkerboard rendering and run with high-quality graphics effects rather than Ultra on the Playstation 4 Pro.
If you have a 1080P panel, then it will be downscaled to suit.
That's life I am afraid, but it is best to wait for the games and hardware to actually drop to get a good idea of where things fall.

I am also not "freaking out" about powerful console specs. - The Playstation 4 Pro and Scorpio isn't what I would call high-end anyway, they are mostly just catching up with current mid-range/mainstream PC's.