Pemalite said:
Radek said:
Yes I know, but we've seen games performing almost as good as i3's on these crappy Jaguars, there's some extreme optimization done by DICE.
I wonder how big of an impact 2,1 GHz is gonna make compared to 1,75 GHz and 1,6 GHz.
It could possibly match that i3-2100 that does almost locked 60 fps.
I may be wrong of course and I may have overestimated results, but 60 fps locked should be possible I think.
|
The Irony is... All those Jaguar "console" cores are roughly equivalent to a Core i3 3ghz Haswell anyway.
There isn't any "extreme optimization" happening. You are getting a compromised experience with less details, lower resolution.
If you want the PC experience, buy a PC.
Also. All the GPU's you listed in that benchmark are faster than the Xbox One, so why would you expect PC-levels of graphics/resolution and framerate out of the Xbox?
|
That's exactly right.
I would even add, if we want to experience PC quality games on console we can't freak out at the thought of a console costing more than 600$. Until the general consumer is comfortable with that thought (or we accept 2 skus as a norm, premium and regular) this conversation will keep leading us no where.
Gaming isn't only about GPU and TFLOPS.
