BattleField 1 is one of the worse performing tittles at 60fps on Consoles, runs at 620p in some cases! Awfull!

[Pemalite]

Radek said:

walsufnir said:

Doubtful.

 

Yes I know, but we've seen games performing almost as good as i3's on these crappy Jaguars, there's some extreme optimization done by DICE.

I wonder how big of an impact 2,1 GHz is gonna make compared to 1,75 GHz and 1,6 GHz.

It could possibly match that i3-2100 that does almost locked 60 fps.

I may be wrong of course and I may have overestimated results, but 60 fps locked should be possible I think.

The Irony is... All those Jaguar "console" cores are roughly equivalent to a Core i3 3ghz Haswell anyway.

There isn't any "extreme optimization" happening. You are getting a compromised experience with less details, lower resolution.
If you want the PC experience, buy a PC.

Also. All the GPU's you listed in that benchmark are faster than the Xbox One, so why would you expect PC-levels of graphics/resolution and framerate out of the Xbox?