| RenCutypoison said: If you want the same game it's playable on a handful of consoles and steam. What's FF gameplay anyway ? Is this something only the "old fans" who only played FF7-9 understand ? |
I've got FF7 thanks, played it a lot (I've long since lost my perfect save 
) You know, the gameplay from FF2 onwards (even 1 would be fine), a strategic turn based combat. KH doesn't have that, it's mostly mash buttons until win (I love the series but in it's own right). Nomura compared it to KH combat, which isn't even like FF gameplay. Most FFs have a similar style with variations of how the magic system works, the main gameplay is still strategic turn based (with a timer), even if it's more fast paced like FF13 or you wander around the combat areas like FF12. Maybe in the end it will be more FF7 than I think but from this interview, I don't have much faith.
| deskpro2k3 said:
It's a remake, not a remaster, and FF13 gameplay was inspired by FF7 Advent Children cinematic battles. From that fact, I have no doubt that FFVII Remake gameplay is going to be a lot better than FFXIII, and FFXV, IMO. when you think about it, there is nine playable characters in the original game, two of them is optional to unlock but besides that, I can't wait to see what Nomura has to say about the gameplay. |
No, Resident Evil (for gamecube) was a remake... which was then released as a remaster (just thought how weird that is). A remaster is taking the same game just tweaking the graphics to a new setting, see most remasters this gen (also see FF7 on Steam). Remake is taking the old game and actually remaking it, new graphics and all, same game though. Reimagining, which this is, is taking the game concept and creating a new one, this is what they are doing. This certainly is not a remake, even if it's called that.
Oh the gameplay might be better than FF13 (infact that's not hard. 
), and through the demo of FF15, I would say probably that too. But that doesn't mean I don't want it like actual FF7.
Hmm, pie.
