| Captain_Yuri said: Thats cause the features that Pixel has will come to other devices where as the hardware features in other flagships will never come to Pixel. Heck, I can get Duo from the playstore on my phone right now. Considering how much more every other flagships offer which pixel doesn't, those 4 things are big considering the price point. Other phones that lack those are in the $400 range and even then, they have things that try to make up for those features in other wise apart from the $400 price tag. For example, the ZTE Axon 7 has dual front facing speakers, 1440p Amoled display, microsd, OIS and etc and it still costs $400. It is missing things like water-resistance, heart-rate monitor, wireless charging and a camera that is as good as the big boys. But the thing is, considering Pixel doesn't have 1440p (on the regular size), dual front facing speakers, OIS or micro-sd, one would think that it would be priced cheaper than $649. Camera + on time software updates (for 2 years) should not cost $250+. $100-$150? Sure but $250? Idk dude And I don't understand how any of what you said refuted my claim of paying more for less... Even if Pixel's camera turns out to be better, it will only be slightly and it is still missing a whole bunch of things that other flagships have... And yes we should. |
http://bgr.com/2016/10/11/pixel-xl-vs-iphone-7-plus-4k-video/
From an iPhone fan site, looks like Pixel camera (4k video) is awesome and better than iPhone 7 at least. Though he did call out the image stabilization. Decent short video you can watch.
