ReCore may become a success despite mixed reviews

[DonFerrari]

AsGryffynn said:

DonFerrari said:

You act like you never saw Phill doing these kind of things.... reviewers were harsh? Maybe, but I hardly see that as done with ill intent against this particular game, they simply didn't like, similar situation with The Order... and in this case there are hardily any clickbaiting on the low range, but probably on the high end, still he pretends like that is a serious issue in this case. It's all to try and defend a game that wasn't very good to begin with.

We had even in this thread several guys that are seriou that said they liked the game but they see it as an 60-65 game perhaps 70 at most. So the average 63 is quite on that, and so a 40 is less clickbait than the 90 that was showed.

The thing is, I am pretty sure at least half of the negative ones were unwarranted. The game was a solid 72, not a solid 62... 

DonFerrari said:

Yep, it would be ok for him to say the reviewers were harsh and that he thought the game was better than the score suggest (and we can pretend not to hear he saying sales are very good, because in this department he lies a lot and that is expected of his position) but to say that some of those were clickbait because they are below the average is silly since the scores above the average are % more away than the ones below.

Both have clickbait. To think the negative ones weren't sounds stupid... 

So your opinion warranting it 72 is what counts? Ok.

40 to 63 is a 23 deviation. 63 to 90 is a 27 deviation. So which one would be more evident of clickbait? Even more when the game is considered mixed to bad by most reviewers (and 40 would enter on the bad) while 90 is very good grade? And I don't consider myself stupid, but maybe I sound stupid, who knows.