ReCore may become a success despite mixed reviews

[DonFerrari]

KiigelHeart said:

DonFerrari said:

Nope. I believe he is point more to the being fanboy on the argument than to being Xbox. But you may interpret as you wish.

Ok..so only a fanboy would suggest that scoring a game like Uncharted 4 or Forza Horizon 3 much lower than most is clickbaiting? Come on now, we all know those reviews are nonsense 😉

Nope, most people would believe it is clickbaiting (but comparing a 89 or 95 game that get a 4/10 score is quite diferent than a 63 game getting the same 4/10) so in the case of this game it could be just sincere dislike for the game instead of clickbaiting.

And not only fanboys would say that, but when you are the head of a company you need to be better than the average joe and lashing out the media because you disagree with the scores. Even more because he didn't talk about the pressure they make for better scores on other outlets. So it sounds more like being butthurt than to trying to improve the industry.

SWORDF1SH said:

Read full interview and he doesn't come off well. 

So everybody is picking on Recore? Don't make me laugh! Spencer is slimey. The twitter post was aimed at Sony so don't lie and don't defend it by saying 'Sony fans send me mean tweets too'. Official mouthpieces and random people aren't the same thing. Plus he's always having sly digs at Sony so he is lying about that too. Bloke is full of bullshit.

He's back at it again knowing there's a lot of fanboys who will spread his shit all over the forums, twitter and YouTube. 

MS fans still think he is a good guy, but time after time he already showed how much of a twister he is bending the truth to his and his company interest.

ironmanDX said:

Normchacho said:

So does the combat get way better after the first 45 minutes? And isn't the purpose of a demo to give people an idea of what a game is like?

 

If I take a bite of my dinner, and it tastes like shit, do I need to clean my plate before I can say I don't like it?

 

Don't get me wrong, people are allowed to like whatever they want and their opinion certainly doesn't need to reflect the consensus. But don't come at me for expressing my opinion on the game. Which I explicitly state is based on the demo the developer provided to convince people to buy the game.

 

And Phils suggestion that the people who gave the game a less than stellar review were being disingenuous is ridiculous. If it were one or two reviews, fine. But It's not. The game has more reviews that are 50 or under than it does 80 or higher. 

 

If Phil wanted better reviews than they should have released a better game.

I came at you for giving it a review based on a demo.  A demo, as you said, give you an idea of the game. An idea. Not the whole story. Which is a big peice of the game you miss only playing a mere demo. That was my one and only point.

If the develope makes a demo that deserves a 63 then most people won't buy the game after playing it. So it would be the fault of the developer for putting an underwhelming demo to represent the game. The demo should represent most aspects of the game and what can you expect, not only be a generic portion of it. And considering our experience with movie/game trailers and demos usually those are the best parts. So since you weren't able to show to the guy that the game get so much better after what the demo shows you failed miserably to deny his point.

GOWTLOZ said:

malistix1985 said:
I was shocked to see the 63 metacritic score, thats the same as the order 1886, when recore's gameplay, mechanics and platforming are an aboslute WIN. Sure its not perfect, the technical issues on the Xbox and some grinding are included but I did find the game to be a 7 or higher, I do think reviews where harsh.

Mostly I feel like reviewers reviewed it like a $60 game instead of a $40 game. If they included that surely it should have scored higher in my opinion.

Anyway, Hope sales are great and updates have already fixed most of the issues people had to bash the game.

The Order 1886 has much better story, atmosphere, graphics and music. Also shooting mechanics are better in The Order 1886 and so are the guns.

These two games just had different directions so comparing them and saying one is better than the other in a way is trying to downplay what the other does better.

And the funniest part is these would be the people that would shit on The Order (that some liked very much, I enjoyed it, even more because a friend loaned to me) is know asking for more love for Recore. The Order didn't had a single flaw or bug I can remember, it only were too short and with little action parts for it to get a very good score in contrast with the good ambience, graphics, plot, mechanics, etc.