Rob5VGC said:
If that is how you interpreted it then that is how you interpreted it. |
Yes that is how I interpret, basically because that is how you are portraying it. There are already games that doesn't emphasize graphics if you want to buy them, so you don't need to be complaining about games that do because other people value that.
pray4mojo said:
At their salary? Sure! I'd rather have less money and more happiness in my life. |
Do you know their salary? And It isn't only Amy that do that time, there are people with lower salaries on the crunch. But if haven't 3 sons perhaps you aren't in an equivalent position to them to know how much do you need and the sacrifice to achieve that. And of course, it isn't because you think that it's enough for you others will find the same.
duduspace11 "Well, since we are estimating costs, Pokemon Red/Blue did cost Nintendo about $50m to make back in 1996"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=8808363
Mr Puggsly: "Hehe, I said good profit. You said big profit. Frankly, not losing money is what I meant by good. Don't get hung up on semantics"
http://gamrconnect.vgchartz.com/post.php?id=9008994
Azzanation: "PS5 wouldn't sold out at launch without scalpers."