ReCore may become a success despite mixed reviews

[Normchacho]

ironmanDX said:

Normchacho said:

So does the combat get way better after the first 45 minutes? And isn't the purpose of a demo to give people an idea of what a game is like?

 

If I take a bite of my dinner, and it tastes like shit, do I need to clean my plate before I can say I don't like it?

 

Don't get me wrong, people are allowed to like whatever they want and their opinion certainly doesn't need to reflect the consensus. But don't come at me for expressing my opinion on the game. Which I explicitly state is based on the demo the developer provided to convince people to buy the game.

 

And Phils suggestion that the people who gave the game a less than stellar review were being disingenuous is ridiculous. If it were one or two reviews, fine. But It's not. The game has more reviews that are 50 or under than it does 80 or higher. 

 

If Phil wanted better reviews than they should have released a better game.

I came at you for giving it a review based on a demo.  A demo, as you said, give you an idea of the game. An idea. Not the whole story. Which is a big peice of the game you miss only playing a mere demo. That was my one and only point.

I specifically say that unless the rest of the game is way better than the demo, that it's a 60-65 game. I also say that my issues with the game are largely mechanical, which means they are unlikely to change throughout the game, and that one of the largest issues others seem to have with the game is that it gets worse later in the game.

Based on my experience with the game, the nature of my problems with the game, and what I've been seeing/reading about the game, 60-65 seems like an accurate score to me.

Better?