ReCore may become a success despite mixed reviews

[Normchacho]

ironmanDX said:

Normchacho said:
The problem isn't reviews being "too harsh". The game isn't very good. Unless it improves VASTLY from what the demo shows, which seems unlikely since the game is just mechanically boring and the later half is supposed to be worse than the first, this is a solidly 60-65 game.

Was going to ask if you'd even played it but...

 

 

I wish I could throw out an arbitrary number as a review from a mere demo. Tell me, how did you come to posses such a skill? I haven't played the game either but I'd like to give it a number too.

So does the combat get way better after the first 45 minutes? And isn't the purpose of a demo to give people an idea of what a game is like?

 

If I take a bite of my dinner, and it tastes like shit, do I need to clean my plate before I can say I don't like it?

 

Don't get me wrong, people are allowed to like whatever they want and their opinion certainly doesn't need to reflect the consensus. But don't come at me for expressing my opinion on the game. Which I explicitly state is based on the demo the developer provided to convince people to buy the game.

 

And Phils suggestion that the people who gave the game a less than stellar review were being disingenuous is ridiculous. If it were one or two reviews, fine. But It's not. The game has more reviews that are 50 or under than it does 80 or higher. 

 

If Phil wanted better reviews than they should have released a better game.